File this under ironic.
At he very time we are all struggling trying out how to pay for gas, The Supreme court just cut Exxon's damages from the Valdez spill one tenth of what the jury decided.
Justice David Souter wrote for the court that punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses, about $500 million compensation. The Exxon Valdez case involves reckless action that was "profitless" for the company and that has already resulted in substantial recovery for substantial injury, Souter wrote. A penalty should be "reasonably predictable" in its severity, he added.
Exxon asked the high court to reject the punitive damages judgment, saying it already has spent $3.4 billion in response to the accident that fouled 1,200 miles of Alaska coastline. A jury decided Exxon should pay $5 billion in punitive damages.
A federal appeals court cut that verdict in half in 1994. This come at the same time Exxon has generated the largest profits of any company in history. The punitive damage award is extremely large, but in fairness, it is less than half of the last quarters profit.
First-quarter profits at Exxon Mobil Corp. were $10.9 billion. The company's 2007 profit was $40.6 billion.
I'm glad to see our government is still handing out favors for big oil.
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Stonehenge Mystery
Stonehenge, the most famous of all of the remaining neolithic stone circles was built over a five hundred year period. Walking around the sarsen stones it is easy to understand why this place still amazes and generates such mystery.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Thursday, June 12, 2008
A Fair Tax Code
Rich people pay the lions share of the taxes in the US. They don't just pay the most money, they pay the largest percentage of their income.
Then again they have a lot more money.
This could then lead to the question, Which is a Better Measure of financial Inequality: Wealth or Income?
In fact the real difference in wealth is not seen by comparing the yearly income of the to top 10% and the bottom 10%- its when you compare the "NET WORTH" of those two groups. The net worth difference is more than `10 times as great as the income difference.The bottom 60% of households possess only 4% of the nation's wealth while it earns 26.8% of all income. This means that the rich pay a larger percentage of their income then the bottom half, but they pay a smaller percentage of their wealth. It is this reality that in large part is responsible for why the "Rich keep getting richer"
If we put aside income and focus on the distribution of wealth,the research points to two quite different views of the amount of inequality in American society.
"Ultimately, we are interested in the question of relative standards of living and economic well-being. We need to examine trends in the distribution of wealth, which, more fundamentally than earnings or income, represents a measure of the ability of households to consume."
Alan Greenspan, Former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
It it easy to see why any question regarding the "Fairness" of any tax plan, is colored by the discussion of Wealth vs Income. Based on income, it is easy to make the point that the wealthiest Americans don't just pay the most money,they pay the largest percentage of their income, often while using the least amount of government services. Switch the discussion to talk about net wealth and the lower half see a system that favors the rich and one in which they are forever "Loosing ground". As property values increase, those who own property see their net wealth rise, where as those that do not, see the dream of home ownership get pulled further out of their reach.
From my own perspective, we have seen the foolishness of communism. The Soviet Union proved that if you try to eliminate the rich, you will not be able to distribute their wealth among the poor to make everyone "Middle-class", you just make everyone poor. Take away the incentive to achieve a higher standard of living, and you kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. The fact is, we need rich people.
For a country to prosper financially it needs the following:
1. A stable government.
2. A population that believes they have a vested interest in the country's success.
3. Insurance companies to protect both commercial as well as personal assets.
4. An educated work force.
5. Leaders that realize that it's the private sector that creates wealth and
Policies that provide conditions for that private sector to thrive.
6. Intellectual Property rights must be honored.
7. Taxes have to be enough to pay for the expectations of the citizens including
the infrastructure to be competitive in the global market- but low enough the
the majority of money is the control of the private sector.
Sure it helps if the country has a large amount of national resources, however Israel has created a standard of living dramatically higher than Saudi Arabia, and did so with out oil.
In fact there are many other conditions that can help or hurt the chances of any country's economy, but the seven above are critical.
So we need a tax system that levels the playing field enough to provide for a basic standard so even the poorest can maintain a reasonable standard of living, and feel vested in America; yet keeps enough wealth in the hands of the wealthy so as to provide conditions for the private sector to thrive and grow.
The truth is it can be very difficult to get that balance right.
Larry Lubell
www.UrbanInsuranceAgency.com
Then again they have a lot more money.
This could then lead to the question, Which is a Better Measure of financial Inequality: Wealth or Income?
In fact the real difference in wealth is not seen by comparing the yearly income of the to top 10% and the bottom 10%- its when you compare the "NET WORTH" of those two groups. The net worth difference is more than `10 times as great as the income difference.The bottom 60% of households possess only 4% of the nation's wealth while it earns 26.8% of all income. This means that the rich pay a larger percentage of their income then the bottom half, but they pay a smaller percentage of their wealth. It is this reality that in large part is responsible for why the "Rich keep getting richer"
If we put aside income and focus on the distribution of wealth,the research points to two quite different views of the amount of inequality in American society.
"Ultimately, we are interested in the question of relative standards of living and economic well-being. We need to examine trends in the distribution of wealth, which, more fundamentally than earnings or income, represents a measure of the ability of households to consume."
Alan Greenspan, Former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
It it easy to see why any question regarding the "Fairness" of any tax plan, is colored by the discussion of Wealth vs Income. Based on income, it is easy to make the point that the wealthiest Americans don't just pay the most money,they pay the largest percentage of their income, often while using the least amount of government services. Switch the discussion to talk about net wealth and the lower half see a system that favors the rich and one in which they are forever "Loosing ground". As property values increase, those who own property see their net wealth rise, where as those that do not, see the dream of home ownership get pulled further out of their reach.
From my own perspective, we have seen the foolishness of communism. The Soviet Union proved that if you try to eliminate the rich, you will not be able to distribute their wealth among the poor to make everyone "Middle-class", you just make everyone poor. Take away the incentive to achieve a higher standard of living, and you kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. The fact is, we need rich people.
For a country to prosper financially it needs the following:
1. A stable government.
2. A population that believes they have a vested interest in the country's success.
3. Insurance companies to protect both commercial as well as personal assets.
4. An educated work force.
5. Leaders that realize that it's the private sector that creates wealth and
Policies that provide conditions for that private sector to thrive.
6. Intellectual Property rights must be honored.
7. Taxes have to be enough to pay for the expectations of the citizens including
the infrastructure to be competitive in the global market- but low enough the
the majority of money is the control of the private sector.
Sure it helps if the country has a large amount of national resources, however Israel has created a standard of living dramatically higher than Saudi Arabia, and did so with out oil.
In fact there are many other conditions that can help or hurt the chances of any country's economy, but the seven above are critical.
So we need a tax system that levels the playing field enough to provide for a basic standard so even the poorest can maintain a reasonable standard of living, and feel vested in America; yet keeps enough wealth in the hands of the wealthy so as to provide conditions for the private sector to thrive and grow.
The truth is it can be very difficult to get that balance right.
Larry Lubell
www.UrbanInsuranceAgency.com
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
The price of gas in 2008
Let's do the Math!
The five largest U.S. oil companies earned $36 billion during the first three months of this year. This is after last year's figures set an all-time record.
Even if we assume that the next months will see the big 5 earning somewhat lower profits, they should still break $120 Billion dollars profit in 2008.
"Americans are furious about what's going on," declared Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and want Congress to do something about oil company profits and "an orgy of speculation" on oil markets.
The cost of energy not only impacts consumers when they fill their tanks, but is a driving force in the price of everything we buy. Congress is getting the message that Americans are "Mad as Hell" and expect their government to do something.In response to the growing rage and falling economy, the Democrats on the hill have pushed legislation to tax the "Windfall profits of the oil industry." The law would boost taxes paid by the large oil companies, or allow them to instead invest the money in new clean energy development.
Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem.""Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," McConnell said.
A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.
The question is, how big are the profits compared to the increased costs we are all paying.
Here is how the basic math works......
Let's say that the combined profits for the big 5 are $120 Billion.
There are 126 Million households in the United States
$120,000,000,000 : 126,000,000 = $952 Dollars/ household in 2008 will go to profit for the Big 5 Oil Companies.
Average Annual Miles per Household = 11,100
The Average Fuel Economy = 22 miles per gallon
11,100 miles : 22 = 504 gallons of get used/ household
Now, let's take 504 gallons and divide that by the $952 Dollars profit/ household in 2008
and we see that about $1.88 of the cost/ gallon we pay at the pump goes straight into the pockets of 5 Oil Companies.
Take a cost of $4.00 at the pump, subtract the windfall profits, and gas is $2.12/ gal.
How do you like that math?
Larry Lubell
www.urbanInsuranceAgency.com
http://www.defra.gov.uk/
U.S. Department of Energy’s Transportation Energy Data Handbookhttp://www-cta.ornl.gov/
U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Residential Energy Consumption Surveyhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/contents.html
Your Car Travel
AssumptionsEmissions per Gallon of Gasoline = 0.0089 tons of CO2Average Annual Miles per Household = 11,100Per Capita Miles Driven in 2004 = 9,941Average Vehicle Trip = 10 milesAverage Fuel Economy = 22 miles per gallon
The five largest U.S. oil companies earned $36 billion during the first three months of this year. This is after last year's figures set an all-time record.
Even if we assume that the next months will see the big 5 earning somewhat lower profits, they should still break $120 Billion dollars profit in 2008.
"Americans are furious about what's going on," declared Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and want Congress to do something about oil company profits and "an orgy of speculation" on oil markets.
The cost of energy not only impacts consumers when they fill their tanks, but is a driving force in the price of everything we buy. Congress is getting the message that Americans are "Mad as Hell" and expect their government to do something.In response to the growing rage and falling economy, the Democrats on the hill have pushed legislation to tax the "Windfall profits of the oil industry." The law would boost taxes paid by the large oil companies, or allow them to instead invest the money in new clean energy development.
Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem.""Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," McConnell said.
A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.
The question is, how big are the profits compared to the increased costs we are all paying.
Here is how the basic math works......
Let's say that the combined profits for the big 5 are $120 Billion.
There are 126 Million households in the United States
$120,000,000,000 : 126,000,000 = $952 Dollars/ household in 2008 will go to profit for the Big 5 Oil Companies.
Average Annual Miles per Household = 11,100
The Average Fuel Economy = 22 miles per gallon
11,100 miles : 22 = 504 gallons of get used/ household
Now, let's take 504 gallons and divide that by the $952 Dollars profit/ household in 2008
and we see that about $1.88 of the cost/ gallon we pay at the pump goes straight into the pockets of 5 Oil Companies.
Take a cost of $4.00 at the pump, subtract the windfall profits, and gas is $2.12/ gal.
How do you like that math?
Larry Lubell
www.urbanInsuranceAgency.com
http://www.defra.gov.uk/
U.S. Department of Energy’s Transportation Energy Data Handbookhttp://www-cta.ornl.gov/
U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Residential Energy Consumption Surveyhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/contents.html
Your Car Travel
AssumptionsEmissions per Gallon of Gasoline = 0.0089 tons of CO2Average Annual Miles per Household = 11,100Per Capita Miles Driven in 2004 = 9,941Average Vehicle Trip = 10 milesAverage Fuel Economy = 22 miles per gallon
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Top 10 Best Selling cars
Best Selling Cars of 2008
1. Toyota Camry: 31,601
2. Honda Accord: 23,957
3. Nissan Altima: 21,635
4. Honda Civic: 20,993
5. Toyota Corolla: 20,736
6. Chevrolet Impala: 17,544
7. Chevrolet Cobalt: 17,310
8. Chevrolet Malibu: 14,105
9. Pontiac G6: 13,942
10. Ford Focus: 11,600
1. Toyota Camry: 31,601
2. Honda Accord: 23,957
3. Nissan Altima: 21,635
4. Honda Civic: 20,993
5. Toyota Corolla: 20,736
6. Chevrolet Impala: 17,544
7. Chevrolet Cobalt: 17,310
8. Chevrolet Malibu: 14,105
9. Pontiac G6: 13,942
10. Ford Focus: 11,600
 |
Car Insurance Info Page |
Visit this group |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
